Research · British Columbia · Ontario

Where Canada’s open project registers look, and where they are silent

At the end of October 2026, Natural Resources Canada’s inventory listed 318 natural-resource projects across all 13 provinces and territories, while British Columbia’s own register listed 648 for one province. What a register shows depends on who publishes it and where they set the bar.

By Northline research deskUpdated 2026-11-063 min read

The same federal inventory, very different counts: natural-resource projects listed by province or territoryThe same federal inventory, very different counts: natural-resource projects listed by province or territory. British Columbia 72; Quebec 50; Ontario 51; Saskatchewan 17; Nova Scotia 11.The same federal inventory, very different counts:natural-resource projects listed by province orterritoryBritish Columbia72NRCan inventoryQuebec50NRCan inventoryOntario51NRCan inventorySaskatchewan17NRCan inventoryNova Scotia11NRCan inventoryNORTHLINE ECONOMICSDescriptive analysis; not advice or a forecast.
The data behind this graphic
The same federal inventory, very different counts: natural-resource projects listed by province or territory
ItemValue
British Columbia72
Quebec50
Ontario51
Saskatchewan17
Nova Scotia11

Download this graphic (SVG, with source)

Summary

Ask how many major projects are under way or planned in Canada and the answer depends on which list you open. When the registers were read at the end of October 2026, Natural Resources Canada’s inventory covered natural-resource projects in all 13 provinces and territories and listed 318 of them. British Columbia publishes its own register of projects across every sector, which listed 648. Ontario publishes a sample of key public infrastructure projects and, above the display threshold used here, listed 262.

None of these numbers measures how much is being built. They measure what each publisher has chosen to list. This note sets out what each register covers, how the same province can look very different depending on the register, and where no open register was found.

Four registers, four different questions

Register Publisher What it lists What its cost figure means
Major Projects Inventory Natural Resources Canada Energy, mining and forestry projects under construction or planned within ten years, above value thresholds The registry’s estimated capital cost
Major Projects Inventory (Economic) Government of British Columbia Projects in every sector above a regional cost threshold The registry’s estimated capital cost
Ontario Builds Government of Ontario A publisher-chosen sample of key public infrastructure projects The estimated total budget, from all funders
Infrastructure Canada Projects Housing, Infrastructure and Communities Canada Public infrastructure projects approved for federal funding, above the display threshold used here The total cost eligible for federal cost-sharing

Because the cost measures differ, Northline never adds them together. A project can also appear in more than one register, and the Investment & Development Monitor flags possible matches instead of merging them.

One province, several pictures

Projects listed, by register British Columbia Ontario Quebec Saskatchewan Nova Scotia
Natural Resources Canada inventory 72 51 50 17 11
Infrastructure Canada approved projects 75 141 89 22 21

The two federal registers cover every province and territory, so they allow a like-for-like count of what each lists. They are not interchangeable: one covers natural-resource projects and the other publicly funded infrastructure. A province with a short list in one can have a long list in the other.

British Columbia’s register lists 648 projects in a single source, and Ontario’s lists 262 in another. Those two counts come from different registers with different rules, so they are not a comparison of the two provinces.

Where no open register was found

For Saskatchewan, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland and Labrador and the three territories, this review did not find an openly licensed provincial or territorial register of major projects. Manitoba publishes a highway and infrastructure capital plan that carries no cost field. Alberta publishes a register whose reuse terms are unconfirmed, so it is not used here. For the places without a register, only the two federal registers are used, and they list natural-resource and federally funded public projects only.

That is a statement about what was found on 31 October 2026. It is not evidence that those places have fewer projects.

Historical context

Quebec does publish an open register. Its Treasury Board Secretariat (Secrétariat du Conseil du trésor) releases its dashboard of infrastructure projects above a cost threshold as open data under a Creative Commons attribution licence, last updated in October 2026; it is not counted in this note.

Evidence: Gouvernement du Québec, Secrétariat du Conseil du trésor (Données Québec): Tableau de bord des projets d'infrastructure de 20 millions de dollars et plus (open data, CC BY 4.0)

What the registers cannot tell us

  • How much is being invested. A listed cost is an estimate for one project. It is not annual spending and not a contribution to GDP.
  • How many jobs follow. None of the registers used here is a source of realised employment.
  • Whether projects proceed. Registers record plans and approvals; projects are delayed or cancelled.
  • Whether two registers describe the same project. Names and costs sometimes match closely; Northline flags those cases and leaves the records separate.

Explore it yourself

The Investment & Development Monitor shows every register on one map, with each project’s source, licence and what its cost figure means. The coverage table lists, for every province and territory, which registers exist, which are shown and which were not found.

Keep exploring

Related research

Sources, method and limits

Limitations
These are counts of listings in registers, not measures of investment, jobs or economic activity. The registers use different inclusion thresholds and measure different things, and the same project can appear in more than one. Where no open register was found, that is a finding about this review, not proof that no projects exist. Alberta’s register is not used because its reuse terms are unconfirmed.
Preparation
Prepared by the Northline research desk with AI assistance; every figure is read from the data library or a cited source at build time.

    Documents

    Approved by an editor on 2026-11-09; published 2026-11-09. See the corrections log.